Cache residents rallying against proposed ski resort near Richmond
By
Cache Valley Daily
Story Created:
Mar 10, 2010 at 10:01 PM MST
Story Updated:
Mar 10, 2010 at 10:01 PM MST
A group of Cache Valley residents are fighting a proposed ski resort east of Richmond at the mouth of Cherry Creek Canyon. David Chadwick and Logan Checketts presented their plans for the 160-acre Rainey Ranch Ski Resort at the March 4, 2010, meeting of the Cache County Planning and Zoning Commission.
The developers requested a conditional use permit for their property, currently zoned FR-40. The “family-friendly” resort would feature up to four lifts, a small lodge, warming hut, a tubing hill with “magic carpet,” and parking for up to 350 cars. Developers hoped to break ground next month and be ready for skiers by Thanksgiving Day.
Joel Pederson, a geology professor and resident of the nearby area who is representing county and Richmond City residents against the resort, urged against quick approval. “The scope of this proposal and the potential impacts to our small community can’t just be rubber stamped for approval,” Pederson said.
He outlined the citizens’ primary concerns, including water quality protection, increased traffic, access to public lands, and impacts to wildlife, roads, and water quality, in a letter signed by county residents. “Frankly we are dumbfounded about how a ski resort at this low foothill elevation, built at what must be a huge cost, could possibly be a viable and long-term business enterprise. We worry that it is likely to fail, leaving instead a long-term burden on county citizens for infrastructure, maintenance, and scarred land.” Richmond residents submitted a similar letter to the commission.
The proposed resort is on private land bordered on one side by a Forest Service boundary and on two sides by winter wildlife habitat owned and managed by Utah’s Division of Wildlife Resources. Richmond is located 12 miles north of Logan.
Dan Miller, executive director for the Bear River Watershed Council asked commissioners to request “an in-depth economic study and a business plan that takes into account 15 to 30 lost skier days for red air day inversions and the boycott by many of the Richmond City residents.” The base of the proposed resort sits at an elevation of 5,782 feet.
Richmond Mayor Mike Hall, echoed residents’ concerns, “I have received countless calls, e-mails and comments on this issue. The Richmond citizens that we have heard from are overwhelmingly against it.” Hall said the city engineer’s report on the city’s cast iron waterline, which lies under the current, unimproved road, would have to be relocated before any improvements were made to the road.
Other residents questioned the cost to local taxpayers for infrastructure and emergency services. In a March 9 letter to the editor in the (Logan) Herald Journal Richmond resident Sam Schropp asked, “Who will pay for the road improvements? Who will guarantee the continued supply and quality of our water? If emergency services need improvement who will pay for it? Are we going to saddle our grandchildren with more debt?”
Planning Commissioner Darrel Gibbons, in an article published in the Herald Journal on March 5, cautioned the applicants at the meeting that “this isn’t going to be a short process. They need to be forewarned that it isn’t going to be something you’d see happen within a few months.”
Cache Valley currently has one ski resort, Beaver Mountain, located 27 miles east of Logan.
More Good Stuff
You have indicated this comment should be removed.
The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .
Andrew Daines said on Saturday, Mar 13 at 4:59 PM
The title of this article is mis-leading. I attended the public hearing, and there were certainly more people supporting this than not.
39196358Anonymous said on Friday, Mar 12 at 8:45 AM
These guys want to start building in April, but has anyone asked them for an Environmental Impact Statement? If not, why not? The proposed road to the resort will take land from either the Forest Service on one side, or the Wildlife Management Unit on the other. In any case I believe further study is warranted.
39123176DM said on Thursday, Mar 11 at 4:16 PM
What makes you label people from Richmond, "Rednecks". I am a resident. I drive new vehicles, have a nice home, and I have my toys. If it the farms you are talking about, open you eyes, your in Cache Valley, there are everywhere. If it's the people, get your head out of your butt and look around. Richmond is no different than everywhere else. Also, I am in favor of the ski resort.
39088336JP said on Thursday, Mar 11 at 1:35 PM
I think it is a great idea! No more driving an hour to Beaver plus it will give them some good competition that is badly needed! Richmond really should try and get another grocery store, that way when they open the ski resort they can have that much more business. It would be good for local businesses. Just too bad there is not more to benefit.
39078058Anonymous said on Thursday, Mar 11 at 9:14 AM
You rednecks from Richmond, let it happen for hell's sake. You act like you have such precious space up there. Pride yourselves on something other than "black and white days".
39060204Dave said on Thursday, Mar 11 at 8:30 AM
Hope this isn't another case of "NOT IN MY BACK YARD"! There might be some legit concerns but that's why a study is made before approval. I don't ski but if approved I sa why not! Low elevation could be a problem.
39057263Anonymous said on Wednesday, Mar 10 at 11:09 PM
Interesting concerns, some of them sound valid. I question the low elevation, hope they have planned on some snow making equipment. However, I'd welcome the additional resort and competition to Beaver. Make 'em buy a bond if it does not work out and get on with building it, I say.
39039224Anonymous said on Wednesday, Mar 10 at 10:42 PM
If they get to complain about increased traffic -so do we.... I say, tell Richmond residents to go somewhere else for groceries -there is a store in Preston... I'm tired of their traffic in MY neighborhood.
39038694Add a comment
Most Popular