Sexual assault trial postponed for Mendon man

Booking photo for Kay K. Moosman (Courtesy: Cache County Jail).

LOGAN — The rape trial for Kay K. Moosman has been postponed after attorneys said they were trying to work out an agreement. The 59-year-old Mendon man’s three-day trial was scheduled to begin February 6.

Moosman appeared in 1st District Court Monday morning. He was previously charged with rape, sodomy and object rape, all first-degree felonies; along with voyeurism and multiple counts of violating a protective order, all misdemeanors.

Cache County deputy attorney Jacob Gordon told the court they had filed a third criminal case against Moosman and asked for more time, as he and defense attorneys work out a possible plea deal.

Moosman was arrested last June after the alleged victim reported the assaults to Cache County Sheriff’s deputies. The defendant was apparently acquainted with the woman, who had previously filed a protective order against him.

Court records show, Moosman waived his right to a preliminary hearing in September. He also pleaded not guilty to all of the charges. He could face up to life in prison if convicted.

During Monday’s court appearance, Moosman was ordered to appear again in court February 11. He is currently out of jail after posting $5,000 bail.


will@cvradio.com

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

6 Comments

  • AnotherVictim January 29, 2019 at 9:09 am Reply

    $5000 bail for alleged rape/sodomy/breaking a protective order & voyeurism? Good hell…no wonder people don’t speak out against abuse *SMH*

    • Latisha Webb January 29, 2019 at 12:46 pm Reply

      There are always two sides to every story. People should stop and think before the pass judgement. If you don’t know the entire story then I don’t think it’s right to pass judgment. Just my opinion.

      • AnotherVictim January 30, 2019 at 9:34 am Reply

        No judgement being passed – just noting the low bail for some of the allegations. I fully acknowledge that their are 2 sides – the truth lies somewhere in between.

        • Denise Wolfer February 17, 2019 at 5:03 am Reply

          The bail amount is also incorrect.

        • A concerned citizens February 18, 2019 at 2:48 am Reply

          The amount of the bail is incorrectly reported as well.

  • Denise Wolfer February 17, 2019 at 5:01 am Reply

    The bail amount is also incorrect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.