Sexual assault trial rescheduled for Mendon man

LOGAN — The rape trial for Kay K. Moosman has been rescheduled. The 59-year-old Mondon man’s three-day trial was originally scheduled to begin Feburary 6.

Moosman appeared in 1st District Court Monday morning. He was previously charged with rape, sodomy and object rape, all first-degree felonies; along with voyeurism and multiple counts of violating a protective order, all misdemeanors.

Moosman was arrested last June after the alleged victim reported the assaults to Cache County Sheriff’s deputies. The defendant was apparently acquainted with the woman, who had previously filed a protective order against him.

Later, Moosman is alleged to have tried to cancel the woman’s cell phone account and vehicle insurance. When confronted by officers, he said the whole thing was a big misunderstanding.

Court records show, Moosman waived his right to a preliminary hearing in September. He also pleaded not guilty to all of the charges. He could face up to life in prison if convicted.

During Monday’s court appearance, Judge Thomas Willmore scheduled the new jury trial to begin June 5. It is expected to last two days.

Moosman was ordered to appear again in court May 20 for a final pre-trial conference. He could still accept a plea agreement until then. He is currently out of jail after posting $5,000 bail.


will@cvradio.com

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

2 Comments

  • D Andersen February 15, 2019 at 7:50 am Reply

    This case should strike fear into every marreied man, when your wife can set you up and file rape charges on you. SAD, SCARY AND HORIFFIYING!!

  • Denise Wolfer February 15, 2019 at 5:42 pm Reply

    Thank you D. ANDERSON. it’s nice to final see someone point out issue that I feel was left out of the media on purpose. For an example of acquaintance with victim being wife? Married how long? It is sad that the system has
    Become your guilty until proven innocent instead of innocent until proven guilty. And by the time things are already finalized it doesn’t matter because of the poor report of media and judgment already made with the whole facts, in my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.